跳到主要內容區塊 :::
   
:::
首頁/研究主軸/教科書研究/研究計畫/歷史核心能力的教與學──以「神入歷史」為例(I)

歷史核心能力的教與學──以「神入歷史」為例(I)

  • 資料類型

    研究計畫

  • 計畫編號

    NSC 101-2410-H-656-004-

  • GRB編號

  • 計畫名稱

    歷史核心能力的教與學──以「神入歷史」為例(I)

  • 計畫類型

    個別型計畫

  • 計畫主持人

    蕭憶梅

  • 經費來源

    國科會

  • 執行方式

    學術補助(科技部等專題研究補助)

  • 執行機構

    國家教育研究院

  • 執行單位

    課程及教學研究中心

  • 年度

    2012

  • 期程(起)

    2012-08-01

  • 期程(迄)

    2013-10-31

  • 執行狀態

    已結案

  • 關鍵詞

    歷史思維,教科書分析,歷史解釋,神入

  • Keywords

    歷史思維,教科書分析,歷史解釋,神入

  • 研究主軸

  •   近年來國內外的歷史教育趨勢均強調「歷史思維(historical thinking)」的重要性,關注的焦點不再只是歷史知識的內容,還擴及到歷史學科的概念與探究能力。然而對於相關的內容定義與教材編寫等相關議題在台灣卻少有人關注。本研究的研究目的在嘗試探索歷史核心能力中「神入歷史」的教與學相關議題,第一年的研究在釐清「神入歷史」的概念,並分析與比較國內外歷史教科書對神入概念的呈現方式,主要聚焦於高中歷史教科書中如何解釋歷史人物行動的動機或理由。  本研究針對台灣四家版本教科書中第四冊世界史近代史部分進行教材分析,研究結果發現各家版本內容多著重於歷史事實的敘述,對事件發生的因果關係與行為背後的理由著墨不多,而主要的解釋呈現方式可分成三種類型:(1)無史料佐證的單一歷史解釋(2)有史料佐證的單一歷史解釋(3)從單一立場出發的多種歷史解釋。
  •   Although ’historical thinking’ has become one of the important aims in the history curriculum in Taiwan, little research has concerned about the related issues such as definition, textbooks, students’ ideas and the practical teaching. The study aims to explore the issue of teaching and learning historical empathy in senior high schools. The first year of the study focuses examining the concept of ’historical empathy’ and analyzing how this concept is portrayed in history textbooks for senior high school, especially on how textbook authors explain people’s actions in the past.  This study was conducted by textbook content analysis, and four different Taiwanese history textbooks for senior high school were examined. The world modern history was chosen as the topic. The results showed that all four textbook content focused more on the basic historical facts than the casual links of historical events or the reasons behind people’s actions. A few examples of historical explanations were detected, and they were categorized into three styles: (a) the authors used longer sentences to explain people’s actions in the past, but still presented it as one single explanation without sources; (b) the authors tried to use historical sources to support their single explanation (3) the authors offered different explanations of people’s actions in the past, but from the same point of view.
top
回首頁 網站導覽 FAQ 意見信箱 EN
facebook youtube