跳到主要內容區塊 :::
   
:::
首頁/研究主軸/教科書研究/研究計畫/主要國家學資歷架構發展現況分析及建構我國高等教育資歷架構之可行策略研究

主要國家學資歷架構發展現況分析及建構我國高等教育資歷架構之可行策略研究

  • 資料類型

    研究計畫

  • 計畫編號

    NAER-106-12-C-2-05-00-1-12

  • GRB編號

    PG10601-0636

  • 計畫名稱

    主要國家學資歷架構發展現況分析及建構我國高等教育資歷架構之可行策略研究

  • 計畫類型

    個別型計畫

  • 計畫主持人

    王令宜

  • 經費來源

    國家教育研究院

  • 執行方式

    自行研究(本院經費-本院人員)

  • 執行機構

    國家教育研究院

  • 執行單位

    教育制度及政策研究中心

  • 年度

    2017

  • 期程(起)

    2017-01-01

  • 期程(迄)

    2017-12-31

  • 執行狀態

    已結案

  • 關鍵詞

    高等教育資歷架構,資歷架構

  • Keywords

    高等教育資歷架構,資歷架構

  • 研究主軸

  •   因應國際化趨勢及增強全球移動力,建立高等教育資歷架構為促進高等教育國際接軌及進行高等教育跨境品質保證之重要基礎;本研究旨在分析主要國家學資歷架構發展現況,以及探討我國建構高等教育資歷架構之可行策略。研究首先進行文獻探討及官方文件分析,瞭解主要國家資歷架構發展現況;其次邀集6 位學者專家進行個別諮詢訪談,分析我國建構高等教育資歷架構之必要性及其面臨挑戰;最後邀集5 位學者專家與政府部門代表進行焦點團體座談,探討我國高等教育資歷架構建構雛型及可行策略。

      本研究獲致結論如下:1.建立資歷架構具有高度價值性,全球有超過150 個國家參與區域、跨國和國家資歷架構,東協所有會員國將在2018 年前完成該國的國家資歷架構;2.我國建構高等教育資歷架構之必要性包含:(1)利於國際流動(2)促進學用合一(3)倡導終身學習(4)提升國際形象(5)有助經貿談判等五方面;3.我國建構高等教育資歷架構之挑戰包含:(1)事權分散整合不易(2)領域龐雜耗日費時(3)學校教育與職業訓練落差等三方面;4.我國建構高等教育資歷架構之可行策略包含:(1)建請行政院成立跨部會專案小組。(2)邀請產官學界共同研議迫切需求產業職能,規劃優先職項及分年期目標。(3)學校課程與職能基準有效對應等三方面;5.我國高等教育資歷架構雛型分為四層級,整合高等教育副學士以上學位及勞動職能基準第三至第六層級,對應歐盟與東協資歷架構第五至第八層級,可擴及銜接歐盟與東協等各國國家資歷架構。本研究對教育政策之建議包括:1.積極建置國家資歷架構,刻不容緩;2.整合建置資歷架構權責,事半功倍。

  •  In response to globalization trend and enhancement of global mobility, it is necessary toestablish a framework for higher education qualifications to ensure Taiwan is on par withinternational standards as well as ensuring the quality of cross-border higher education. Thisresearch aims at analyzing the current situations of the qualifications framework in majorcountries and strategies to construct the framework for higher education qualifications inTaiwan. The study first investigates literature references and analyzes official documents, tounderstand the development of framework for higher education qualifications for majorcountries. Secondly, 5 scholar experts were interviewed to analyze the necessity of buildingframework for higher education qualifications in Taiwan and the challenges it faces. Lastly, afocus groups discussion was held between 5 scholar experts and government officials inexamining the framework for higher education qualifications prototype and feasiblestrategies.

     The study’s conclusions are as follows: 1. Establishment of a framework forqualifications possesses significant value. There are over 150 countries worldwide haveformulated regional, international and national qualification frameworks, with all Associationof Southeast Asian Nations membership countries completing their nationals qualificationsframework by 2018. 2. There are five aspects that need to be taken into consideration inestablishing framework for higher education qualifications in Taiwan: a) Beneficialinternational mobility; b) Promotes the knowledge-action integration; c) Advocate lifelonglearning d) Improve national reputation; 5) Beneficial to economic negotiations etc. 3. Thechallenges of establishing framework for higher education qualifications in Taiwan includethe following: a) Dispersed authority and difficulty in integration; b) Time consuming todistinguish the large variety of fields; c) Gap between school education and vocationaltraining. 4. Feasible strategies for building framework for higher education qualifications inTaiwan include the following: a) Request the Executive Yuan to establish cross departmentproject teams; b) Invite the industry, government officials, academic scholars to discussrequired occupational competency and determine priorities as well as yearly goals; c)Effective correspondence between school courses and occupational competency standards. 5. The framework for higher education qualifications prototype comprises 4 levels, integratehigher education associate bachelor or above with occupational competency standard level 3to level 6 to align with the level 5 to level 8 of Europe and Association of Southeast AsianNations. The The study’s education policy suggestions include: 1. Active construction of the nation’s framework of qualifications; 2. Integrate qualifications framework authority, ensuring significant effects from minor changes.

top
回首頁 網站導覽 FAQ 意見信箱 EN
facebook youtube